The package is not a malware because the provided evidence is insufficient to make that determination. Evidence 0 indicates an 'Untrustworthy source project' with low confidence. This is a warning flag, not definitive proof of malicious intent. A low OpenSSF score and lack of popularity suggest a higher risk of vulnerabilities or poor code quality, which could be exploited, but doesn't automatically equate to malware. The package might contain vulnerabilities that could be leveraged by attackers, but that's different from being malware itself. Malware requires malicious code designed to cause harm. The evidence lacks any indication of such code. Further investigation is needed, including:

• Static analysis: A thorough examination of the package's code for suspicious behavior (e.g., network connections to malicious servers, file system modifications, data exfiltration). Tools like VirusTotal could be used.
• Dynamic analysis: Running the package in a sandboxed environment to observe its runtime behavior and identify any malicious actions.
• Dependency analysis: Examining the package's dependencies to identify any known malicious or vulnerable components.
• Reputation analysis: Checking the reputation of the package and its maintainers across various sources.

Without further evidence of malicious code or behavior, classifying this package as malware is premature and unreliable. The low OpenSSF score and lack of popularity should be treated as a risk factor requiring further investigation, but not as conclusive proof of malicious intent.