The package is not a malware because the evidence presented is insufficient to reach that conclusion. Evidence 0 highlights that the project has only published four versions. While this could indicate immaturity or lack of maintenance, it's not inherently indicative of malicious intent. Many legitimate open-source projects, especially those focused on niche functionalities or with small development teams, have a limited number of releases. The lack of other evidence, such as suspicious code behavior (no LLM analysis or YARA results are provided), suspicious file contents, or unusual network activity, prevents a definitive malware classification. The project's GitHub repository (with 6833 stars and 1051 forks) suggests a reasonably established and visible project, further mitigating concerns raised by the limited number of versions. A lack of evidence does not equate to evidence of benignity, but in this case, the available data is insufficient to label the package as malware. Further investigation, including code analysis and potentially behavioral analysis in a controlled environment, is needed before a conclusive determination can be made.