The package is not a malware because the evidence presented is insufficient to make such a determination. While the evidence points to a lack of trustworthiness due to the low number of versions (Evidence 0), low GitHub stars and forks (Evidence 1), and a potentially low OpenSSF score (Evidence 1), these are indicators of risk, not definitive proof of malicious intent. These factors suggest the package may be immature, poorly maintained, or lack community scrutiny, all of which increase the potential for vulnerabilities and unexpected behavior. However, none of the evidence points to actual malicious code or behavior. The absence of information about LLM-based file analysis or YARA rule results is significant. Without analysis of the package's actual code and functionality, it's impossible to conclude that it's malware. Further investigation, including code review and dynamic analysis, is necessary to determine if the package contains malicious code or exhibits malicious behavior.