The package is not a malware because the provided evidence is insufficient to make such a determination. Evidence 0 indicates an "Untrustworthy source project" with low confidence. This is a risk factor, suggesting potential issues with the package's quality, maintenance, or security. However, it does not definitively prove the package is malicious. Low popularity and OpenSSF score are indicators of potential risks, but they are not synonymous with malicious intent. The package could simply be a poorly maintained or neglected project, not a deliberately harmful one. Further analysis is needed. Specifically, static and dynamic analysis of the package's code is required to identify any malicious behavior, such as unauthorized network access, data exfiltration, or system compromise. Analysis of embedded files (mentioned but not provided) is crucial. Without examining the actual code and its runtime behavior, concluding that the package is malware based solely on the low trustworthiness of its source project is premature and inaccurate. A low OpenSSF score warrants further investigation, but it is not sufficient evidence to label the package as malware.