No verification record available.
The package is likely not malware, despite the YARA alert. Here's why:
Low Confidence YARA Match: The evidence relies solely on a YARA rule ('python_exec_complex') flagging the exec() function within a JavaScript file (index.js). YARA rules are known to produce false positives, especially with complex expressions. The match itself doesn't indicate malicious intent without further context. The $exec string alone is insufficient evidence.
Context is Crucial: The exec() function in JavaScript is a legitimate function used for executing strings as code. Its presence alone doesn't automatically imply malicious behavior. The code snippet exec(pre.slice(index).join('')) suggests the code is dynamically constructing a string to execute, but this could be part of a legitimate feature, perhaps related to ANSI escape code handling, which is hinted at by the package name wrap-ansi.
Package Name and Project: The package name wrap-ansi suggests a purpose related to handling ANSI escape codes (used for terminal text formatting). This aligns with a benign use case. The associated GitHub project has a moderate number of stars and forks (120 stars, 25 forks), which while not a guarantee of safety, is not indicative of a clandestine operation typically associated with malware distribution.
Lack of Additional Evidence: The analysis lacks other crucial indicators of malware. There's no mention of network activity, file system modifications, data exfiltration, or other malicious behaviors. The absence of LLM-based analysis, which is considered more accurate, further weakens the case for malicious intent.
Conclusion: While the YARA alert raises a red flag, the lack of corroborating evidence, the plausible benign explanation based on the package name and function, and the limited project information suggest a false positive. A more thorough investigation using static and dynamic analysis techniques, along with LLM-based analysis if available, would be necessary to definitively rule out malware. However, based on the current evidence, the likelihood of this being malicious is low.